I'm not telling you to watch this video...
But this once again proves my theory: WOMEN LOVE ROCKY.
If Thurston Howell III were alive, he'd hang out here.
I'm not telling you to watch this video...
But this once again proves my theory: WOMEN LOVE ROCKY.
A panel group from the 1980s debates the question of what each person owes, if anything, to a fellow person. The episode is "Do Unto Others."
I got hooked on late night PBS television in the late 90s and early 00s. Around that time, my local station decided to fill the dead hours - the really dead hours - with college courses. I forget if there was a name for it but you'd watch episodes on TV in the same way that you would normally attend a lecture and then presumably get assigned homework and then take a test. It was a way of geting college credit from home.
"Ethics in America" was one of my favorites, it's so deliciously watchable. It's so watchable that it seemed to be a "no brainer" that something like this could be a hit on television. "Ethics in America" or something like it, didn't deserve a 3 AM timeslot, put it on in primetime! It never happened but there are a few bizarre ways in which this premise bubbled up, leaked out and became a big hit anyway.
In some ways I think the trashy daytime talkshows filled that gap - almost every episode was examining the question of "what is right?" The conflicts between the people on stage were due to disagreements of ethics, philosophy, morality and then that wasn't enough so all the people in the audience got to argue likewise. Even Fred W. Friendly's monologue at the end of this program, summing everything up and putting it all into perspective, reminds one of Jerry Springer's "Final Thought" at the end of each show.
And there was no bigger TV show in the 90s than "Seinfeld." Eschewing "lessons" and "issues" it only concerned itself with comedy and comedy alone. And yet it was a "smart" show precisely because much of the conflict arose from different ethics and much of the episodes revolved around arguing (justifying) different sides. It's a spin on Seinfeld's (and Larry David's) Abbott and Costello influence: "[T]hey had a remarkable knack for presenting both sides of a silly argument and making both points of view seem perfectly logical."
JERRY: So what happened to you yesterday? We were supposed to go to the auto show, I waited for you, you never came.
ELAINE: I'm sorry, I got really busy. How long did you wait?
JERRY: Five minutes.
ELAINE: Five minutes? That's it?
JERRY: What's the difference? You never showed up.
ELAINE: I could've! I mean, last week we waited for that friend of Kramer's for like, forty minutes.
JERRY: Well, we barely knew the guy.
ELAINE: So, the longer you know someone, the shorter you wait for 'em.
JERRY: That's the way it works.
And it occurs to me now that much of the gap in ethical discussion on TV is filled, for most people, by cable news shows. That's not my thing but I suppose that's another outlet through which this desire is pacified just enough that we never get anything really substantive.
The spiritual successor to "Ethics in America" and the closest thing to the show I proposed was "Justice: What is the Right Thing to do?" and that provided clear evidence that I was way off because no one watched it.
You can watch the entire "Ethics in America" series online here. The best episodes are episodes 6 and 7 ("Under Orders, Under Fire" parts 1 and 2), by the way, but I embedded episode 1 simply because that's the only on on youtube.
Earlier this year I posted a great youtube video that examined how special effects were done with primitive technology.
Well, it was successful enough to become a series. As with most things film related, the sequels are not as good as the original but still really interesting and worth watching, I think.
Part 2:
Part 3:
Part 4:
Talent Coordinator Ryan Williams recalls his favorite moments working at the Late Show.
Let's face it, it's all about the beagle playing dead.
First, there was this "10 Minute Power Hour:"
And from this, I thought the idea of the "best" instant ramen was intriguing and decided to seek out the top ones. Unfortunately, in their slapdash, "random" aesthetic, they make it impossible to follow along and therefore are guaranteed to provide no actual benefit to the viewer - that's a guarantee.
But thanks to this post, from u/FluidModeNetwork on Reddit, who took the time to painstakingly break down the film frame-by-frame and determine the results, I have a source of truth and so I bought and tried the top handful. Now that the expensive multiple deliveries from Japan are complete - who said instant ramen was cheap? - and now that I've more or less recovered from my salt coma, I've put together the results.
Also notable: there are little squares of chicken. I'm not sure I want to know what grade of meat Cup Noodle is using in their instant ramen but it's not great - and how could it be?
It has the noodles you already know, and it's salty, a little tomatoey and a little spicy. Ultimately, I like this soup, I think it's pretty good, but wouldn't recommend it because... it's Cup Noodle... and it just is what it is.
This ramen is large and comes with 3 packets - a brown gravy, a packet of greens and a packet of seaweed. Within the packet of greens is a spiral piece that I've shown above. What is it? I don't know - it tastes like fish.
I don't like the fish flavor, I don't like the seaweed even a little but this is the first instant ramen to justify this post's existence. You are getting something at home which tastes of authenticity - it is literally instant... ramen. This is the one in the video where they say, "This is the best so far."
In subsequent tries, I didn't add the seaweed and skipped the spiral. It still isn't perfect, but it is large, it's complex and I can't stress enough how authentic it tastes.
It should also be noted that I wasn't able to find this one, as such. What I found was "Sumire Sapporo Rich Miso Ramen." Not the exact wording but I couldn't find the exact wording. The labels looked the same and I consulted someone who knows Japanese and my best guess is that it's the same.
This comes with 3 packets - 1 powder, 1 gravy, 1 herbs. The herbs are Japanese herbs/vegetables that I can't identify (similar to #3.)
This has a rich miso, umami taste. I think the richest of the lot. It's also very authentic tasting without the seafood downsides of #3 and it's a large size. It's very hard to make confident judgements because I'm only getting a few (or sometimes 1) shots with each but I think this is my #1. The richness is the thing, for me.
This is the one where they state in the video, "You know what that has that the other ones don’t - umami." And, while others do have umami, they are correct that this has it also.
I had trouble coming up with anything to describe this with. It has thin noodles, a good salty flavor, a nice umami flavor, some hot spice but nothing predominates. Why is this #1? My best guess is that this is the SweeTango Effect where the thing that achieves #1 is the thing that no one can complain about, where everything seems right and in proportion. Highly recommend, for sure, but I think/I guess I like #2 better.
Feel free to try for yourself. All of these are inconvenient to try to obtain but not impossible. I found a few on Amazon, a few on various Japanese mart sites (be careful with scams) and a few on Ebay. But the prices are crazy, especially when you factor in shipping and the fact that it's noodle soup that takes a few cents to make.
Watch this or don't.
The point is, it once again proves my theory: WOMEN LOVE ROCKY.